![]() In quantum field theory graviton is the elementary particle that mediates the gravitational force and is expected to be massless, and that is because the gravitational force itself has an infinite range. Moreover, several of today's theories like string theory, superstring theory, M-theory and loop quantum gravity, and quantum field theory predict the existence of graviton particles. Physically, the dispersive term is ascribed to the quantum of gravitation having a nonzero rest mass m g, or equivalently a noninfinite Compton wavelength λ g = h/ m g c, where ϕ is the potential function of the gravitational field. In relation to the geometry of the universe we find that the mass of the graviton varies according to the relation m gr ∝ R sc, and therefore m gr obviously controls the geometry of the space time through a deviation of the geodesic spheres from the spheres of Euclidean metric. (2003), times the square root of the quantity q − 1/2, where q is the deceleration parameter of the universe. In an effort to establish a relation between the graviton mass and the basic parameters of the universe, we find that the mass of the graviton is simply twice the Hubble mass m H as it is defined by Gerstein et al. Similarly, the total mass of gravitons that exist in the universe is proportional to the number of information N that is, M gr ∝ N. Furthermore, we find that the number of gravitons contained inside the observable horizon is directly proportional to the number of information N that is, N gr ∝ N. As a result we find that the mass of the graviton scales as m gr ∝ 1 / N. We investigate the relation of the mass of the graviton to the number of information N in a flat universe. A very stranger result is obtained if we divide the gravitational charge c to the Compton length for every particle, or in other words the gravitational energy of the particle distributed in their Compton length is just the particle energy or the " rest of mass ". It results that the graviton is first unit (indivisible) of Universe. A proof of the model is done by applying it to light bending due of Earth. Also, in this context it results that an equal part of the ex-Micro-black-holes are generated at horizon entry that correspond to Electroweak period during Universe evolution (10 11 GeV 10-29 s). Thus, is explained how the gravity (only few gravitons remaining at Confinement in nucleons) is embedded in matter particles, and in the BH's nuclei of galaxies of gravitational charge only (gravitons), an old waited answer. After radiation decay, the heritage of gravitational charge (gravitons) quantized as c M G Planck = inside (or on event horizon) into equilibrium with the inner field like electrostatic Coulomb field as being generated by the few photons remained, finally give the mass. Also, these ex-Micro-black-holes (BHs µ) by merging release gravitons which deform the space-time, and also decay of all free photons as BH's nuclei of galaxies, or if kipping someone else, as electrons, others leptons (quarks) and uncharged particles (neutrinos). It will be shown how the Micro-black-holes particles produced at the horizon entry into a number of 62 61 10 − ≅ N by quantum fluctuation as virtual micro-black holes pairs like e+ e-creation, stay at the base of: the origin and evolution of Universe, the Black Holes (BH) nuclei of galaxies, of the free photons creation of near mass-less as by radiation decay that condensate later at Confinement in to the structure of gauge bosons (gluons). So no theory is perfect, even if expressed with mathematical formulas. Scientific theories do not show the laws of nature, but are our understanding of physical phenomena to explain the nature and closeness of the common phenomena to the dominating rules of nature. Phenomena are the appearances, which constitute our experience noumena are the (presumed) things themselves, which constitute reality. According to Kant, it is vital always to distinguish between the distinct realms of phenomena and noumena. ![]() Still we are using philosophical concepts in the physics. For this reason, Newton had named his book "Mathematical Principles of Natural Philosophy". Before Newton, physics was descriptive and analytic, and physicists had not used mathematics yet, so physics was closer to philosophy than science. In the early days physics was a part of the philosophy. The question is what relationship is between being and time and whether in physics, being and time are separable? In this essay, I have answered these questions. In this essay, I have reviewed physical being and time, because everything in nature is a physical entity. Generally, there are three approaches of religion, philosophy and science to being and time. Understanding of being and time has always been interesting and difficult for mankind.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |